I could tell from her bloodshot eyes that she'd been pondering the question all night. What scares you the most?
For many couples, living together is simply the next logical step in the progression of intimacy. There's no handwringing, no tortured internal debate. But for Sharon, the whole prospect had been terrifying from the start. She'd had more than a few bad relationships, and the last one had died a slow, painful death over the course of three long years, in a tiny apartment that seemed even more suffocating when she and her boyfriend were fighting. So she had good reason to be scared. And because I knew the research, the very fact that she had so many misgivings was more than enough to give me pause as well.
Playing House or Playing with Fire? Prior to , many people might have advised Sharon against moving in with her boyfriend, no matter how well they'd been getting along. The r esearch findings on premarital cohabitation were dismal. In the US, living together before marriage was associated with lower marital satisfaction, lower commitment among men, poorer communication, higher marital conflict, higher rates of wife infidelity , and higher perceived likelihood of divorce.
Hardly a ringing endorsement for shacking up. But in , Psychology Today featured an excellent article , reviewing the potential dangers of living together before marriage, and by then, the view was clearly changing. Researchers like Scott Stanley had begun to paint a far more balanced picture of previous findings. Some cohabitors, it seems, are more equal than others, with one group showing all the telltale signs of disaster that previous research had revealed, and another, luckier group, living happily ever after.
The difference between the two came down to their state of mind. Flash forward to , and it's now clear that a person's attitude toward the decision to cohabit has everything to do with their relationship's success or failure. If both partners show an active and clear commitment before deciding to live together, by say, getting engaged, they seem to do just as well as people who get married before making a home together see, for example, research here and here.
In fact, for women who make a conscious, careful decision to cohabit, living with their partner before marriage may actually reduce the risk for divorce. This is serious business, though—no room for waffling; serially cohabiting women have twice the divorce rate of women who only live with the man they later marry.
Repeated attempts to "try" living with someone may reflect a general reluctance to commit. The success gap between committed and uncommitted or noncommittal partners serves as a cautionary tale.
Couples who slide into cohabitation before they feel ready could be sounding the death knell for their relationship. Why Living in Sin isn't for the Faint of Heart The dangers of mindlessly drifting into cohabitation--whether from a sense of economic pressure, a desire to "test" the relationship, or worries about living alone--have become increasingly clear.
Living together is an active long-term commitment, like having children, and without the proper preparation and nurturance of your relationship, you could be doing yourself and your partner more harm than good. The reason may, in part, have to do with the many pressures an unmarried couple still faces. It's easy to forget that "shacking up" used to be viewed as the act of a reckless counterculture and—at least in the eyes of some religious communities— the province of "Godless rebels.
As recently as , the California State Senate voted to preserve a year old law that made it a crime for an unmarried couple to live together "openly and notoriously," and in , seven states still considered unmarried cohabitation outright criminal — "a lewd and lascivious act.
As more and more people choose to live together before marriage a trend that has been on the rise since the 's , these more conservative attitudes may become less and less common. But until that time, many unhitched cohabitors still face lingering societal pressures, and some of them aren't particularly subtle, like the bad reputation that longer term, unmarried cohabitation continues to have in the press and the culture at large.
Who among us, for example, hasn't wondered when our friends or relatives who've been living together all these years will finally "settle down" and get married? In reality, duration of cohabitation, alone, seems to have no implications for a couple's success or failure For all these reasons, some cohabiting couples wind up cut off from important supports, with even their own family members reluctant to offer financial help or advice.
In extreme cases, one or both members of the couple are either rejected or excluded by their partner's parents not as rare as one would hope. As cohabitors, their relationship isn't taken quite as seriously—a fact that can have important implications for the livelihood of any couple the support of friends and family for a partnership is a strong predictor of success.
Given these many cultural and emotional obstacles, is it any wonder that couples wavering in their commitment often witness the demise of their relationship once they start living under the same roof? True, it can kick off a rich, new phase in your relationship, but it can just as easily spell the end of things if you're not careful.
You'd be wise to take some important steps before you make the move. If you have concerns about cleanliness, chores, general upkeep, or even who's welcome when you're not there, you'd better talk now. If you're afraid this will create tension, then think twice about living together. You'll have to face the problems sooner or later, whether you talk about them or not, so if they're a deal-breaker, your silence won't save the relationship. You can start by talking about your readiness to live together.
If you can't even broach that one, then you're better off waiting until you feel more certain about each other. If you think you'll feel resentful picking up your partner's financial slack, then don't choose a place beyond their means. If you truly want to live together and you want a nice place, then realize you're subsidizing your partner so you can have both. That's your choice, and you don't have to make it. If your partner insists on paying more than you can afford, then say, "OK, but let's agree, right now, that if you start feeling resentful about money, we'll know it's not working.
If possible, plan to spend at least a month in each other's place. Your habits will vary, depending on how much you feel like you're in your own space. Trials give you a chance to see how each of you truly lives, when you're feeling at home and when you're not and you're likely to feel a mix of both at first.
A recent University of Columbia study suggests that many young couples may be choosing this very solution, opting for "stayover" relationships where they spend three or more nights a week together while maintaining their own separate residences. Living with a partner involves negotiation, but it shouldn't be constant. If little, low-impact quirks cap on the tooth paste, anyone?
Bear in mind, you probably have a thousand quirks of your own that your partner may have to adjust to, so don't ask for changes unless you're prepared to work on some yourself. When it comes to chores, we're often blind to what others do and acutely aware of our own contribution. To make matters worse, some chores are less visible than others dusting and vacuuming sometimes go unnoticed.
So decide what you want to do and state out loud or record on paper what you've done. If one of you prioritizes less visible chores, then at least they won't go unnoticed.
If you're moving into your partner's place, think about and then discuss how you might put your own, personal stamp on the place--some new items, some decoration, a desk, etc.
If you encounter resistance, pay close attention: Moving in shouldn't mean you stop living independently. Separate experiences and friendships are what make you unique, so keep them in your life after the move. In the past, living together before marriage was considered a potentially perilous choice, and people spoke in hushed tones about the couple next door who continued to live in sin.
But in the new millennium, even after religion, for many, started losing its grip on our judgments about matters of love, science seemed poised to replace the previous moral framework, warning us about the psychological and emotional dangers of living together out of wedlock.
We know a little more now. As for Sharon, she opted for stayovers before making the leap to cohabitation. She was wise to do so. She and her boyfriend had broken up by the end of the year.
If you like my posts, let me know! I frequently respond to comments and questions there. You might also enjoy these popular posts: